“Neoconservatives who have praised Barack Obama's appointments: Fred Hiatt, Henry Kissinger, Jamie Kirchick, Jon Kyl, Joseph Lieberman, Karl Rove, Max Boot, Michael Ledeen, Mona Charen, William Kristol.”
Tuesday at 6:06 pm
- Link
tim windsor, ernie yacub, TStowers and 8 other people liked this
so the president is just a symbol, a figurehead - Gregory Lent
A tool. - Sean McBride
I wrote a post today on neoconservatives (its in my FriendFeed somewhere), but in short, I think they are trying to rehabilitate their image by claiming credit for various foreign policy success. I wouldn't pay too much attention to them, we'll have to wait and see what Obama actually does before passing judgment. - Jamelle
See Robert Dreyfuss's important article, just published: "Still Preparing to Attack Iran: The Neoconservatives in the Obama Era" http://www.truthout.org/120308... The neocon era is not remotely over. It is quite likely that they will succeed in expanding the Iraq War to Iran and Pakistan, which has long been a major objective of theirs. The Obama administration is dominated by the neoliberal wing of the neoconservative movement. Dreyfuss has all the details. - Sean McBride
iran attack would piss me off - Gregory Lent
Sean - I say this with all sincerity - I appreciate your ability and propensity for categorization and the ability for cleaner macro-level analysis it provides but I have absolutely no idea what "neoliberal wing of the neoconservative movement" means - If Iran developed a nuke and Rachael Maddow began advocating military intervention would she start the "Progressive neoconservative" wing? - Marco (aureliusmaximus)
An Iran attack would probably collapse the American economy much worse than it has already collapsed, in part as a result of the Iraq War -- but the neoconservatives don't care. - Sean McBride
From Alternet: http://www.alternet.org/audits... - V for Veselka
V - Robert Dreyfuss is one of the world's foremost experts on these topics. It's unfortunate that quite a few hardcore Obama supporters aren't familiar with all the facts in this article. If they were, they wouldn't be taken by surprise by coming events. - Sean McBride
marco, to me they are simply two words for the same thing (and probably some sort of deep ego/fear/personality disorder that any ideological extremism both springs from and acerbates) and these two camps basically converge in a world view that is as intense as it is blind .. this mindset seems increasingly present in american foreign policy decisions and world view .. an early sign of decline - Gregory Lent
Look there are two reason for war with Iran, not that I approve or condone it. One, Global economy, wars make jobs. Two, the Arab countries holding the world for ransom with Oil. If Oil prices are high the world economy suffers. If oil prices are low all the democratic governments in the middle east get toppled, and you will have a Muslim Extremist Fundamentalist controlling the world with Ballistic missiles and God forbid nuclear bombs. What is the solution? - Igor The Troll
And please do not tell me it is Israel. That is just plain Antisemitism. Hitler hated the Jews before there was the State of Israel. Muslim Extreme Fundamentalist hated Christian before the State of Israel. - Igor The Troll
@gregory and therein lies the rub - both you and sean are very adept at viewing things from a 30,000 ft level which lends to neat categorization, the identification of shared motivations and easy spotting of potential trends - these are all good things but I think that, unfortunately, they serve a more powerful function when used in hindsight - when used in the thick of things it leads to an apples and oranges debate of ideas - Dreyfuss was awesome in Down and Out in Beverly Hills by the way (kidding) - Marco (aureliusmaximus)
lol ... in the thick of this thing, something is up ... maturity, change, and world-wide vision are what got obama elected, hope he can live up to his own hype, given what he has surrounded himself with .. as for me, i think all of these dramas are the result of a huge wind blowing through creation, and nothing can be done about any of it ... collective consciousness is what it is - Gregory Lent
yes and no from my perspective - i may not agree with you or sean but i do believe that people like you play an important role as do the people you label neocons - it doesn't always work as it should but on balance i believe that the free and aggressive debate of ideas weeds out the weak arguments and elevates those with merit - i agree that human nature is the cause of many of these patterns but i don't believe for a second that you believe nothing can be done about it - Marco (aureliusmaximus)
Marco - are you able to engage in dialogue or debate with any of the facts and analysis in Robert Dreyfuss's latest article? The close ties between neoconservatives and neoliberals have long been known to political analysts -- they are two arms of the same lobby. The neoliberal wing of the Democratic Party enabled the neoconservative war against Iraq in the Republican Party. They are now coordinating their activities to expand the Iraq War to Iran and Pakistan. - Sean McBride
Marco - by the way, the neoconservatives labeled themselves neoconservatives -- that is their own label. Do a search on Amazon.com on the term, and you will discover a large collection of high-quality books dissecting the ideology, history, policies and plans of the neoconservatives. - Sean McBride
Marco: i must confess, I didn't know what "neoliberal" meant when a friend said it to me a while back. It made no sense. I thought it somehow had to do with genuine liberalism. She kept conflating it with neo conservatism. I kept saying "why don't you just call them conservatives or neo cons?" To which she said, "because they are neo liberal." After that, I did some homework (which exceeded the scope of this link btw) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/N... - V for Veselka
Sean: I think if you were to do a rough survey of Friend Feeders (i.e., how many of you can define the difference between liberalism, neo liberalism and neo conservatism) you'd find that very few could even articulate a definition of neo liberalism. I'd argue that it's not so commonly known or understood beyond those who have formally studied social and political thought. - V for Veselka
Sean - here is all I am saying - i get the value that labels provide i just think that when you put as much emphasis on the justification of the use of those labels you do yourself and the larger debate a disservice. Look back at your original post - its core logical assertion is not: "we should be careful of foreign policy x, y and z for these reasons" - it is "Obama's appointments are bad because person x, y and z likes them" - u have completely shifted the focus of the debate from the actual arguments.. - Marco (aureliusmaximus)
...that concern you most and made it about something completely different. I'm all for talking about the need to prefer one approach over the other but when you force everything into such a macro-viewed narrative it makes it difficult - you say "they are now coordinating their activities to expand the iraq war to iran and pakistan" but, by itself, that statement has no meaning - Marco (aureliusmaximus)
labels are a substitute for values .. hard to talk about values, easy to use labels .. the underlying assumption with political criticism is indeed about values, that there is a better way to live than is currently being extolled ... all people feel this about their set of values .. labels save the day by being in the end not nearly as threatening as opposing values - Gregory Lent
its only hard to talk about values because we refuse to - values are derived from our experiences and what we believe about human nature and the world we live in - the problem we get into is that we refuse to consider or believe that someone who prioritizes a different set of values than we do does so because, like us, they want an outcome that will make everyone's life better - we don't understand their value matrix so instead of at least trying to truly understand their motivations we group them... - Marco (aureliusmaximus)
...label the group and then look for whatever patterns we can find within the labeled group to support our assumption that they have impure motives. You assume that neocons share a common dedication to the nefarious - some of them may I don't know - what i do know is that when you focus on assigning motivations based on the labels that have been derived it completely derails the debate - it is no longer about the best outcome but whether or not your assessment of their motivations is correct - Marco (aureliusmaximus)
i totally agree with you marco ... and am convinced that the way forward in almost all current conundrums, from economy to terrorism to politics is to fully engage in value-based dialogues ... but ego comes in, and people would rather suicide than give up their values, because self-definition is based on it ... we don't have the skills or the vocabulary yet to do this ... will take some years .. but has to be done ... me me me has no strategic value anymore - Gregory Lent
i definitely think we have the vocab and ability to do it now - the problem is - as we unfortunately saw on FF during the election - that we all want someone else to do it first - many of us may walk into a conversation prepared to listen with an open mind but as soon as someone breaches the line that separates honest debate centered around values and motivation-assigning generalized attacks we feel the need to respond in kind - only takes a few people who refuse to play that game to get the ball rolling - Marco (aureliusmaximus)
While you bitching like old hags, Noah will build a ship and we will fly away! LMAO - Igor The Troll
values, should they be based on belief? or should they be even more basic, such as brainwaves, a quiet mind being the answer to most problems? should we embrace concepts like spiral dynamics and design for the higher awarenesses? or let the soup continue to be stirred by the flow of collective consciousness? can we admit that differing concepts of being a person demand different systems of organization/government? or does everybody have to have a "democracy"? how about gender concepts, is there one right - Gregory Lent
Marco - I am very precise about assigning policy positions to neoconservatives and neoliberals -- I work empirically from the facts. Both the neocons and neolibs worked in tandem to engineer the Iraq War, and they are now agitating to expand that war to Iran. Do you disagree? Did you take the trouble to digest Dreyfuss's article fact by fact? The neocons especially are an open book about their relentless warmongering. - Sean McBride
Marco - Rachel Maddow hasn't been agitating for an Iran War -- that is exactly the point -- she is a progressive, not a neoliberal. For that matter, conservatives (including libertarians) and liberals (including progressives) share much more in common with one another than they do with neoconservatives and neoliberals. - Sean McBride
Regarding the war and economy issue: an Israeli or American attack on Iran would probably drive the price of gas to $10 or $15 a gallon, and hammer the final nail into the coffin of the American economy. And I don't know of any economists who believe that the projected expenditure of several trillions of dollars in the Iraq War has been good for the American economy; on the contrary: we are on the verge of a major depression. - Sean McBride
So praise for appointments = philosophical and ideological agreement? Are we that partisan now that you can't respect the other if you disagree with them? - mikepk
V - an intense discussion about neoconservatism and neoliberalism has been going on in policy circles for decades now. Try Googling both "neoconservatism" and "neoliberalism" separately and together for some background. Most Americans know nothing about the dialogue because the mainstream media have worked hard to keep the debate from the American public. For the most part, the mainstream media are owned and controlled by neoconservatives and neoliberals, and they seek to keep as low a profile as possible. - Sean McBride
mikepk - There is no conceivable way that neoconservatives would praise these appointments if they didn't believe that the appointments were compatible with their policy objectives. Their number one objective is to expand the Iraq War (which they engineered) to Iran and Pakistan. Did you take the trouble to read the Robert Dreyfuss article carefully? - Sean McBride
More from Robert Dreyfuss: "Last spring, Tony Lake and Susan Rice, for example, took part in a WINEP "2008 Presidential Task Force" study which resulted in a report entitled, "Strengthening the Partnership: How to Deepen U.S.-Israel Cooperation on the Iranian Nuclear Challenge." The Institute, part of the Washington-based Israel lobby, was founded in coordination with the American-Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC), and has been vigorously supporting a confrontation with Iran. The task force report, issued in June, was overseen by four WINEP heavyweights: Robert Satloff, WINEP's executive director, Patrick Clawson, its chief Iran analyst, David Makovsky, a senior fellow, and Dennis Ross, an adviser to Obama who is also a WINEP fellow." - Sean McBride
You know, I am beginning to realize that empirical political analysis conducted at the level of sophistication and detail of folks like Robert Dreyfuss is going over the heads of most Americans (including most Friendfeeders). They can't keep track of how all the pieces fit together to form influential political networks that fly under the radar of public consciousness. Too much information. - Sean McBride
i actually don't like the labels so much, i can see intention and motivation, and proceed in my understandings from there .. but they are necessary for great discourse, which i usually can only stand on the sidelines and watch/feel - Gregory Lent
When political activists consciously and deliberately associate themselves with particular ideologies, political groups and policy positions, then labels matter. Labels are how we keep track of who is pushing what policies and with what objectives and motives. Labels matter greatly when they are applied fairly and accurately. - Sean McBride
agree - Gregory Lent
Neoconservatives and neoliberals are two arms of one lobby. Where neocons and neolibs agree: AIPAC+, anti-Muslim militancy+, Clash of Civilizations+, global plutocracy+, Global War on Terror+, Iran War+, Iraq War+, Joseph Lieberman+, police state culture+, privatization+, pro-Israel militancy+, torture+, warrantless wiretaps+, WINEP+, World War IV+. - Sean McBride
can you extend that to economics/taxes/employment/education? - Gregory Lent
Gregory -- neocons and neolibs are overwhelming focused on foreign policy issues as defined by AIPAC, and are interested in domestic policy issues primarily insofar as they impact or support their foreign policy agenda. Note that Joseph Lieberman, a leading neoliberal, has been preoccupied with maintaining his position of authority over Homeland Security. - Sean McBride
Marco: does Dreyfuss have his facts in order here? "When it comes to Iran, however, it's far too early to dismiss the hawks. To be sure, they are now plying their trade from outside the corridors of power, but they have more friends inside the Obama camp than most people realize. Several top advisers to Obama - including Tony Lake, UN Ambassador-designate Susan Rice, Tom Daschle, and Dennis Ross, along with leading Democratic hawks like Richard Holbrooke, close to Vice-President-elect Joe Biden or Secretary of State-designate Hillary Clinton - have made common cause with war-minded think-tank hawks at the Washington Institute for Near East Policy (WINEP), the American Enterprise Institute (AEI), and other hardline institutes." - Sean McBride
How to spot empirical researchers: a high frequency of proper names in their analysis (especially persons and organizations). The fewer the proper names, the weaker the analysis, usually. - Sean McBride
Sean - you're missing what I am trying to say - it may very well be that your passion and aim is to track macro-level movements of thought and expose what you believe to be dangers inherent to particular groups like "neocons" - no problem if that is the case but if that is so then you need to adjust the end goal of your arguments so that they are consistent with your focus - look back at your comment that begins with "Does Dreyfuss have his facts in order here?" - nothing in that comment provides any... - Marco (aureliusmaximus)
...ground for substantive debate over the best course of action as it pertains to Iran. that thrust of that entire comment can be boiled down to this: Obama has appointed a bunch of people who are hawks on Iran to key positions. I could grant the validity of that statement and we wouldn't be one step closer to discussing the harms and benefits of any one approach over another. - Marco (aureliusmaximus)
Marco - we seem to be communicating right past one another. Quite a few people who supported Obama because he opposed the Iraq War are concerned that his administration has been taken over by the ringleaders of that war from the neoliberal and anti-progressive wing of the Democratic Party. Now they are targeting Iran for attack. Dreyfuss in his usually brilliant way pulled together the facts on this issue. Do you have comments on the specific substance here, or on my point at the head of the thread that a large number of neoconservatives are pleased with Obama's appointments? - Sean McBride
Marco - if you want to present the case that going to war against Iran would be a good idea, then by all means go ahead. :) Seriously. What's the best case? Will it stand up to informed scrutiny? (Sorry to be so slow in figuring out what you were saying.) - Sean McBride
Sean - I am not going to pretend to know exactly what should be done at this point - i have a number of thoughts, specific to the Dreyfuss article and other wise but to avoid driving people insane with the kind of back and forth necessary to discuss the myriad of issues related to the issue i am going to create a private room - again, my larger point here has been that this kind of categorization is good for academic analysis but bad for substantive discussions over current problems in need of solutions - Marco (aureliusmaximus)
Marco - we are in full agreement that policy issues should be discussed on their merits, and without regard to the labels attached to participants in policy debates. I would be curious to hear your thoughts about the wisdom of attacking Iran here in this thread or anywhere else. - Sean McBride
If it was a surgical strike on Iranian nuclear facilities it could put back Iranian plans for nuclear weapons back a few decades. Does anybody here think that the Middle East would be a better place if the Iranians had Nuclear weapons? Just off to read the Dreyfus article. - laprensa66











